The disallowed Siba Mahashe try against Leinster is the jumping-off point for a sharp column arguing that TMO overreach has fundamentally broken the viewing experience of professional rugby. The core argument: the original 'clear and obvious' mandate has been abandoned in favour of forensic, CSI-style reviews — applied inconsistently, and in the Mahashe case, absurdly so. Hollie Davidson was two metres from the play and called no infraction; if she and the assistant referee missed nothing obvious in real time, the TMO had no business intervening after the conversion. The piece draws the contrast sharply: the same Dublin game saw a Leinster try waved over without review, and the week before, three high hits in a Champions Cup semifinal went uninvestigated. It's the inconsistency, not just the pedantry, that's the real problem — and the comparison to VAR in football's Premier League title decider reinforces the point. The column also takes a swing at New Zealand rugby's overseas eligibility rules, arguing that blanket application of the policy to Retallick and Mo'unga — players with deep All Black service — is self-defeating ahead of the Greatest Rivalry series. It wraps with URC final-round permutations and predicted playoff seedings, with the Lions potentially needing results to go their way just to hold a top-eight spot.