Erasmus is making a coherent case against World Rugby's rule requiring both head coaches to attend any pre-match referee meeting. His argument is straightforward: those meetings were historically used to flag your own team's tactical intentions so referees could position themselves correctly and anticipate edge-case scenarios. That only works in a confidential setting. With the opposition coach in the room, you're handing over tactical information for nothing in return, so the meetings become hollow box-ticking exercises about whether everyone intends to follow the laws — which they're supposed to do anyway. His conclusion is that coaches are now forced to air grievances publicly or through the AMS system rather than in a productive pre-game dialogue, which suits nobody. The planned casual beer with Dave Rennie — explicitly "without the referee" — underlines the absurdity he sees in the current arrangement. Whether World Rugby revisits the policy is the bigger question this piece raises.