Three former Springboks — De Villiers, Shimange, and Burger — are unified in their verdict on the rumoured O'Connor signing: it's the wrong solution to the wrong diagnosis. Their core argument is that the Sharks' fly-half problem isn't really a personnel problem at all. It's a structural one. Over the past decade, a conveyor belt of quality tens — Libbok, Chamberlain, Bosch, Cronje, Masuku, Hendrikse — have all ended up playing the same way in Durban: deep, passive, and disconnected from the attack. De Villiers points to chronic selection inconsistency as the root cause, while Burger goes further, arguing that until the Sharks fix their attacking shape and identity, no ten will thrive there regardless of pedigree. The model they're chasing, per Burger, is a line-threatening ten in the mould of Faf-era Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu or Bordeaux's Jalibert — and O'Connor at 35 isn't that. Shimange flags Vusi Moyo as a prospect worth backing instead. The collective message: stop plugging gaps and build something.