Nigel Owens has sided with Erasmus and Rennie in opposing World Rugby's decision to scrap private one-on-one pre-match meetings between coaches and referees. The new rule requires both coaching staffs to be present simultaneously, and Owens — drawing on his own experience — argues the old format worked well for everyone: referees could flag issues they'd be watching for, coaches could raise concerns in a low-key setting, and both parties left better prepared. His central concern is that World Rugby's fix may have created a bigger problem than it solved. By removing the private channel, coaches are now taking those same concerns public — media press conferences instead of quiet conversations — which is noisier, more combative, and arguably more damaging to referee authority than anything that happened behind closed doors. The piece is worth reading for Owens's insider perspective on what those pre-match meetings actually looked like in practice, and why he thinks the paranoia driving this policy change is misplaced.