Laurie Mains isn't buying the Baltimore scoreline as a true measure of the gap between these sides. Speaking on The Platform NZ podcast, the 1992–95 All Blacks coach argues New Zealand were competitive enough in Tests 2, 3, and 4 to have won any of them — and that the 43-28 final score flatters South Africa. His central diagnosis: the aerial battle was the series-defining deficiency. With Damian McKenzie unable to contest high balls against a Springbok side that exploited the up-and-under relentlessly, Mains believes the All Blacks gifted South Africa 30–40 metres a kick, and that positioning either Will Jordan or Jordie Barrett beneath those kicks was the obvious fix that never came. He's not in despair about the All Blacks' direction — he flags Ardie Savea's absence as a significant factor and expects this group to improve from the experience — but his reading of the series is that tactical negligence in one area, not a wide quality gap, decided the 3-1 outcome.