The points South Africa have been conceding — to the All Blacks across the series and to the Wallabies in Perth — have raised questions about Jerry Flannery's defensive system. Gary Gold and Kevin Foote push back firmly on that narrative. Gold's argument is structural: the Boks run a deliberately aggressive, line-speed defence that accepts a degree of error as the cost of imposing maximum pressure. The trade-off is that when it works, it forces opposition mistakes and feeds South Africa's scrum game — which Foote identifies as a core design feature, not a side effect. Foote also credits Australia's triple-stack attacking alignment as a specific counter to line-speed defences, giving them the width to play around an aggressive rush when the timing is off. Neither man sees the conceded points as a systemic failure; both frame it as the known liability of a high-reward system that the Boks have no intention of walking away from.