The debate over Richie Mo'unga's eligibility for the Springbok series has opened a broader question: should NZ Rugby adopt something akin to the Giteau Law to allow overseas-based players back into All Blacks contention? While Bryn Hall thinks a threshold-based overseas policy — say, 50 Tests or 100 Super Rugby caps — is worth exploring, James Parsons pushes back firmly, arguing the All Black jersey demands financial sacrifice and residency commitment. Parsons does, however, carve out a nuanced position: he's not opposed to NZ Rugby creating a specific carve-out for players already signed to NZ Rugby contracts, which is exactly Mo'unga's situation. His logic is that Mo'unga isn't an overseas mercenary — he's already contracted back home — and that distinction makes him a special case without needing to blow open the eligibility rules more broadly. For Springbok supporters, the subtext matters: this debate is unfolding precisely because the Greatest Rivalry series looms, and NZ Rugby's internal politics may yet determine whether Mo'unga lines up against the Boks at all.