Jeremy Paul has gone on the offensive against World Rugby's brake-foot law, triggered by the two scrum penalties that hurt the All Blacks against the Springboks at the weekend. His argument isn't just that the law is being over-officiated — it's that it's physically unsafe. Paul's case: when eight players hit at pace, a hooker with a planted front foot cannot absorb 900kg of force the way a player on the balls of their feet can, and the law effectively puts the hooker in a biomechanically compromised position. Kieran Read adds a different critique — that brake-foot policing is simply pointless, and that referees should focus on keeping the scrum up and square rather than hunting technical infringements. Paul goes further with a practical alternative for officials: watch the loosehead's hips, not the hooker's foot. If the defensive loosehead's hips break away from the hooker, that's the fault — everything else, he argues, is noise. Worth reading if the scrum-law debate from the weekend's Test has you wanting a front-rower's technical take on what's actually happening at the coalface.