On The Verdict podcast, Schalk Burger and Jean de Villiers pulled apart a result that flattered the Springboks considerably. Scotland's stats — 60% possession and territory, 550 post-contact metres, 15 line breaks — were dominant, yet Erasmus's largely inexperienced side (12 players with fewer than 10 caps) won 42-28. Burger's verdict was blunt: Scotland should have won. The explanation, he argued, was Scotland's red-zone execution — multiple handling errors at critical moments left them with just 2.3 points per 22-metre entry against a Bok defence that was genuinely under the cosh, missing 46 tackles and conceding 16 line breaks. Hanyani Shimange framed it as a recurring Scotland pattern: they consistently put themselves in winning positions and don't convert, pointing to the Six Nations and previous Murrayfield collapses as evidence they remain a 'what-if' team. The flip side of the analysis is what it says about Erasmus's squad depth — that a rotated, capped-light group could absorb that level of pressure and still find a way to win speaks to the composure being bred through the system.