Gavin Rich pushes back against the assumption that retaining a near-identical starting XV for the Baltimore decider means the Boks will simply grind out another maul-and-scrum performance. With only three changes from game one — Willemse back for the injured Kolbe, Hooker in on the wing, Arendse fit again at outside back, and Morne van den Berg at nine — the squad looks familiar, but Rich argues the options off that platform are anything but predictable. Erasmus himself rejected the idea that the more expansive play in Soweto was a deliberate stylistic shift, insisting the first-test conservatism was largely down to poor execution rather than design. The analytical meat is in how Rich maps the Baltimore bench options: Libbok as a late-game attacking finisher when defences are tiring (Erasmus's own framing), Feinberg-Mngomezulu's defensive reliability locking him in as the starter, Esterhuizen as a genuine centre option rather than just a loose-forward bomb, and Willemse's positional flexibility potentially creating a three-way attacking headache in the second half. The piece builds a credible case that the Boks' real strength going into this decider is tactical versatility — and that the uniform selection masks it rather than reveals it.