Brenden Nel argues that World Rugby's revised coach-referee engagement protocols — introduced partly in response to Erasmus's 2021 Lions video — have created a system that is arguably less functional than what it replaced. Under the new rules, pre-game meetings with referees only happen if both coaches agree to attend together, which Nel notes almost never occurs in practice. Post-game feedback is capped at six clips and uploaded to a shared platform visible to all coaches and referees — effectively making any genuine grievance a public declaration. Erasmus himself confirms he hasn't had a single pre-game referee meeting under the new system, and questions the logic of a framework that was never developed with coaching input. Nel's central point is that transparency, while well-intentioned as a protection for match officials, has had the unintended consequence of removing the private channels through which coaches could actually resolve concerns constructively. Quesada's public outburst after Italy's Wellington loss is held up as a direct symptom: when there's no workable private route, frustration spills into the open. The piece warns that without a functional feedback mechanism, World Rugby risks recreating exactly the kind of public coach-referee conflict it was trying to prevent.