After New Zealand levelled the Greatest Rivalry series at 1-1 in Cape Town, Dave Rennie went public with complaints that the Springbok scrum is illegally 'walking around' — and promised World Rugby feedback. Erasmus wasn't having it. His counter-argument is pointed: the first six scrums in the match all collapsed on New Zealand's ball and were simply reset without incident, so why is the "walking around" narrative only surfacing when the All Blacks are under pressure at their own set piece? He frames Rennie's comments as a deliberate referee-lobbying exercise rather than a legitimate technical grievance, and broadened the attack to include four unpenalised head-contact incidents in the first half and a crooked lineout — things he chose not to complain about publicly. The subtext is clear: Erasmus sees this as a pressure campaign ahead of the third test in Johannesburg, and he's drawing the battle lines early.